History Repeats: The Never-Ending Cycle of Incumbent Resistance from Steam Engines to Stablecoins

Ever noticed how every big innovation faces pushback from the old guard? From smashed looms to stalled laws, history shows a pattern—and it's playing out right now in finance with stablecoins.

Throughout history, established industries have resisted game-changers, often under the banner of "public safety." This delays progress until the upsides win out.

Today? Banks are lobbying against stablecoins like USDC (backed 1:1 by reserves) to prevent "deposit outflows." Sound familiar?

Historical Parallels: Resistance Under the Guise of Safety

Take the Industrial Revolution. Luddites wrecked steam-powered looms in the early 1800s, fearing job loss and chaos. Valid worries? Sure. But mechanization boomed anyway, sparking growth and new jobs.

Fast-forward a century: Automobiles threatened horse carriages. Incumbents pushed the UK's "Red Flag Act" (1865), forcing a flag-waver to walk ahead of cars. Safety excuse? Check. It crippled innovation until repeal in 1896.

Lesson? Incumbents use regs to cling to power, short-term gains over long-term wins.

Contemporary Echoes in Finance: Banks vs. Stablecoins

Flash to now: Banks resist stablecoins—digital dollars like Circle's USDC, pegged to USD with full 100% reserves in cash/Treasuries.

They're pushing laws to cap yields, citing "stability risks." Exhibit A: The CLARITY Act, stalled in early 2026 amid crypto vs. bank lobbies. It would've burdened issuers more than banks. As Coinbase's Brian Armstrong said, this version "would be materially worse than the status quo." And then he added his follow-up: "We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill."

Irony alert: Stablecoins run on 100% reserves. Banks? Fractional reserves—just a slice of deposits liquid. Who's really protecting what?

Addressing Banks' Claims to "Safer" Status

Banks tout their edge. Let's unpack—systematically.

1. Systemic Safety Nets

Banks have Fed ties, FDIC insurance ($250K cap), and bailouts. Stablecoins? No such luck—yet.

But remember 2008 or SVB 2023? Safety nets needed massive US gov't rescues. Stablecoins could match if regs allowed insured limits. It's policy, not design flaw.

2. Legal Hierarchy

Banks are sovereign system insiders; stablecoins are "private" risks that might "scale too fast."

Overblown? Retail won't flee banks overnight. Plus, issuers like Circle disclose reserves a few days and every week with audits and data can be accessed by the public anytime —way more transparent than banks' black-box filings.

3. Historical Precedent

Banks claim tradition = safety. Regulators play it safe with new tech.

But bank runs wrecked giants in the Depression and beyond, saved only by bailouts.

Stablecoins (100% fiat-backed) held 1:1 pegs in volatility; algorithmic flops like UST show reserves matter. Tradition? More like intervention dependence.

Comparative Analysis: Banks vs. Licensed Stablecoins 

Here's a side-by-side:

Aspect	Banks	Licensed Stablecoins (e.g., USDC)
Backing	Fractional reserves (loans, assets) – leverage with risk	100% liquid U.S. assets (cash, Treasuries) – full redeemability
Transparency	No public disclosures; periodic filings	Weekly attestations; trending to real-time
Safety Net	FDIC + Fed backstops (intervention-dependent)	None yet, but could add insurance
Crisis History	Survived 2008/SVB via bailouts	Weathered volatility without depegging (fiat-backed)
Trust Basis	Licenses + guarantees	Emerging licenses + open data

Bottom line:

• Banks' "safety" leans on gov't crutches

• Stablecoins shine in transparency and could level up with fair rules.

Balancing Innovation and Regulation: A Path Forward

Depegging risks? Real, but fixable with audits and smart regs—not bans. Banks could even join in, tokenizing deposits for blockchain perks. This cycle screams for balanced policy: Foster competition, learn from history, put public good first.

_________________________________________________________

My job? Connecting them with the talent that turns vision into reality

_________________________________________________________

At Pacific Banks Search & Selection, we specialize in connecting you with top-tier AI talent. Whether you're looking to integrate AI into your operations, enhance your product offerings, or streamline your backend process, our recruitment experts are ready to help you find the perfect AI expert for your team.

Contact us and let us know your company's AI staffing requirement. Together, we can improve how we recruit for AI roles to benefit everyone involved.

Learn more about our AI recruitment services - www.careerbanks.com/ai-professional

Read More - www.careerbanks.com/blog009