Building In-House AI Inferencing Models: Hype vs. Reality
- PacificBanks Search
- May 26
- 4 min read
As a personnel recruiter working with IT Directors and Key IT Tech Buying Decision makers in banking and insurance companies, I’ve seen a surge in corporate interest in building in-house AI inferencing models. Business executives, inspired by claims from companies like DeepSeek, believe that downloading pre-trained large language models (LLMs) for in-house use is a cost-effective and quick solution, especially given DeepSeek’s reported US$6 million training cost for its V3 model compared to OpenAI’s US$100 million for GPT-4. The assumption is that if DeepSeek can train models at a fraction of the cost, maintaining or downloading them for simply AI Inferencing purpose must be affordable (in other words, should be very cheap), particularly for financially robust sectors. However, as I discuss with IT leaders, the reality of in-house AI Inferencing involves significant costs, infrastructure, and strategic planning. Here’s what corporations need to consider before diving in.
The DeepSeek Influence and Misconceptions
DeepSeek, a China-based AI company founded in July 2023, has disrupted the AI landscape with its cost-efficient approach. Their R1 model, released in January 2025, is reportedly 20 to 50 times cheaper to use than OpenAI’s o1 model, thanks to techniques like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and optimized Nvidia H800 GPUs. However, experts suggest the US$6 million figure for V3 likely excludes significant research and hardware costs, potentially totaling US$1 billion (MIT Technology Review). This has led some executives to mistakenly assume that in-house AI inferencing, downloading/using pre-trained models, is “very cheap” and achievable in months. The reality is more complex, especially for non-tech corporations.
Why In-House AI Inferencing?
Unlike training new LLMs, the goal for many corporations, particularly in banking and insurance, is to download well-trained models (e.g., from platforms like Hugging Face) for in-house inferencing to address specific needs:
Data Privacy and Security: In regulated industries, safeguarding sensitive customer data is critical. In-house inferencing keeps data within the company’s infrastructure, ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR or CCPA and reducing breach risks.
Intellectual Property Protection: Companies with proprietary algorithms or patents need to protect trade secrets. In-house AI avoids exposing sensitive IP to external providers.
Regulatory Compliance: Evolving AI governance, with some regions mandating local data processing, makes in-house solutions necessary to avoid legal risks.
Avoiding Vendor Lock-In: Relying on external AI providers can lead to dependency on their pricing and terms. In-house inferencing offers autonomy and control.
Industry-Specific Customization: Sectors like finance require tailored AI for tasks like fraud detection or risk assessment, which generic cloud services may not fully support.
Long-Term Cost Efficiency: For large-scale operations, in-house systems may reduce recurring fees from AI providers, despite high initial costs.
The Real Costs of In-House AI Inferencing
While downloading a pre-trained LLM avoids the high costs of training, setting up and maintaining an in-house AI Inferencing system is far from cheap. Key cost components include:
Infrastructure: Hardware like GPUs and servers can cost tens of thousands to millions, depending on scale. Unlike tech giants, most banks and insurance firms lack the resources for massive GPU clusters, potentially leading to higher latency compared to cloud solutions.
Talent: Skilled professionals, such as data scientists ($94,000–$161,590/year) and developers ($80,000/year), are needed to manage models, optimize inferencing, and ensure security.
Maintenance: Ongoing updates, monitoring for model drift, and compliance add to costs. Custom AI solutions can range from $6,000 for simple chatbots to over $300,000 for complex systems.
In contrast, cloud-based AI services like Drift ($400–$1,500/month) or TARS ($99–$499/month) offer lower upfront costs but may not meet privacy or customization needs. For banks and insurance, the higher costs of in-house systems may be justified by compliance, but they challenge the notion of being “very cheap.”
Strategic Considerations for Corporations
Before committing to in-house AI inferencing, companies must evaluate key factors to ensure alignment with their goals:
Budget and Infrastructure: Can you afford the hardware and talent needed? Most non-tech firms lack the scale for massive infrastructure, which may result in latency trade-offs.
Latency Tolerance: Applications like fraud detection may tolerate medium latency, making in-house viable, but real-time needs may favor cloud solutions.
Data Privacy and IP Protection: Are these concerns critical enough to justify the investment? For regulated industries, this is often a key driver.
Regulatory Compliance: Do local laws mandate in-house processing? This is crucial for international operations.
Long-Term Vision: Does in-house AI align with strategic goals, such as cost efficiency for large-scale operations or tailored solutions for unique use cases?
A hybrid approach—using in-house inferencing for sensitive tasks and cloud services for others—may balance cost, compliance, and performance for many firms.
Final Thoughts
Building an in-house AI inferencing model offers significant benefits for Banks and Insurance companies, including data privacy, IP protection, and regulatory compliance. However, the misconception that it’s a low-cost, quick solution, fueled by DeepSeek’s claims, overlooks the substantial investments in infrastructure, talent, and maintenance.
Corporations must ask:
✔️ Is there sufficient budget for hardware and skilled professionals?
✔️ Can the business accept potential latency trade-offs?
✔️ Are data privacy, IP, and compliance critical concerns?
✔️ Does in-house AI align with long-term strategic goals?
If multiple answers are “yes,” in-house inferencing may be worthwhile. Otherwise, cloud-based or hybrid solutions might be more practical, leveraging external expertise while addressing specific needs.
As we navigate this AI-driven era, it’s crucial to move beyond the hype and make informed decisions. IT professionals and business leaders, are you seeing a shift toward in-house AI inferencing, or is the cloud still dominant?
My job? Connecting them with the talent that turns vision into reality
_________________________________________________________
At Pacific Banks Search & Selection, we specialize in connecting you with top-tier AI talent. Whether you're looking to integrate AI into your operations, enhance your product offerings, or streamline your backend process, our recruitment experts are ready to help you find the perfect AI expert for your team.
Contact us and let us know your company's AI staffing requirement. Together, we can improve how we recruit for AI roles to benefit everyone involved.
Learn more about our AI recruitment services - www.careerbanks.com/ai-professional
Read More - www.careerbanks.com/blog009